A petitioner has sought Lahore High Court’s proceedings on charges of contempt of court against the inspector general of police (IGP), DIG of Elite Force and other officers for not complying with orders of Chief Justice Muhammad Qasim Khan in a land possession case. Petitioner Muhammad Irfan Butt filed the plea through Advocate Asif Awan. On December 16, the chief justice had directed IGP Inam Ghani, who was present in the courtroom, to return the land of the petitioner occupied by the Elite Force. In his contempt petition, the complainant cited as respondents the IGP, DIG and SP Elite Force, additional chief secretary home, senior member Board of Revenue and the deputy commissioner Lahore. “The petitioner has still not been given possession by the respondents and the order of LHC has been disobeyed,” he stated. He also alleged that the commandant Elite Force had threatened him and refused to give him the possession of the land. The petitioner requested that the possession of the land be restored without any further delay. The LHC issued the earlier order while hearing the plea against the alleged occupation of Waqf Property Board land. The petitioner claimed that the land measuring over 72 kanals had been occupied by the Elite Force, although he had acquired it on lease. Published in The Express Tribune, January 13th, 2021.
from Punjab News Updates and Insights - The Express Tribune https://ift.tt/35F5rx4
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Field Marshal Asim Munir orders full military support in K-P flood response
Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir has directed all Pakistan Army units deployed in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) to intensify r...
-
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has partially accepted a petition filed by some district and sessions judges and declared the Islamabad Distr...
-
The Pakistan Navy has successfully concluded a two-day exercise aimed at countering sub-conventional and asymmetric threats at all major por...
-
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has submitted its written statement to the constitutional bench (CB) of the Supreme Court hearing ...
No comments:
Post a Comment